Skip to main content
Dynamic structure & docking · Developer-reported · 2026-02-10

Induced-fit co-folding beyond familiar targets

Can structure models represent large ligand-driven protein rearrangements when the target, pocket or conformational transition is far from training examples?

What researchers are trying

IsoDDE is presented as a unified drug-design engine trained to reason jointly about ligands, proteins and conformational change instead of docking into a rigid precomputed pocket.

Why it matters

Real binding sites move. Correctly modeling induced fit could reduce false poses, improve selectivity reasoning and expose conformations missed by rigid docking.

Evidence boundary

Out-of-distribution claims depend strongly on benchmark construction, training-set leakage controls and exact success thresholds.

Organizations represented

Isomorphic Labs

Demonstrated evidence

What has actually been shown.

  • Developer-reported improvement on difficult Runs N' Poses generalization cases relative to AlphaFold 3.

Unresolved questions

  • How are unseen chemotypes and target families isolated from training data?
  • Does structural accuracy translate into enrichment or medicinal-chemistry decisions?
  • How stable are alternative conformational ensembles?

Signals to watch next

  • Temporal-split benchmarks
  • Prospective challenge sets
  • Independent co-folding evaluation
  • Conformational ensemble outputs
Connected evidence graph

Related BioAtlas model passports.

AlphaFold 2 / 3

The model that solved the 50-year protein-folding problem.

4/7 evidence fields documented

Boltz-1 / Boltz-2

Open-source AF3-quality structure — plus binding affinity.

4/7 evidence fields documented

Chai-1 / Chai-2

An AlphaFold3-class complex predictor, made freely usable.

4/7 evidence fields documented

NeuralPLexer / Enchant

Physics-aware structure + multi-task ADMET foundation models.

2/7 evidence fields documented
Primary and evaluation sources

Inspect the evidence directly.