Skip to main content
model-family passport · Review date not recorded

RFantibody

De novo epitope-specific antibody design from the RFdiffusion lineage.

4/7Evidence fields documented
60-SECOND EVALUATION VIEW

What should a scientist know before using RFantibody?

SupportedEvidence supports the stated context with explicit boundaries
Best suited forGeneration · Optimization
Evidence supportsExperimental antibody design: Peer-reviewed + experimental
Evidence does not establishUniversal superiority, therapeutic success, clinical utility or regulatory acceptance.
Major limitationPerformance depends on the evaluation dataset and operating conditions.
Current registry recordRFantibody1 recorded release · Review date not recorded. A newer version is not assumed to be universally better.

What it is

RFantibody uses generative structural modelling for epitope-conditioned de novo antibody design and connects structural generation with sequence design and validation.

Evidence trail

BioAtlas keeps the path from source to decision visible. A connection records provenance; it does not imply that evidence is sufficient for every context.

Sources3 connectedPrimary resources and normalized claims
Claims1 normalizedAntibody sequence modelling
EntityRFantibodymodel-family · RFantibody
ReviewReview date not recordedReview date not claimed
ConclusionContext requiredAdd to an evaluation before operational use

Model passport

Entity typemodel-family
OrganizationInstitute for Protein Design, UW
Model family introduced2025
AccessLimited open access
Commercial useAllowed / verify checkpoint terms
DeploymentHybrid
ComputeGPU recommended
Domainsantibody · design
Biology → representation → computation → evidence

How RFantibody represents biology

model-familyantibodydesign

Category is navigation. These fields describe the model-specific computational transformation and deliberately override broad category defaults.

1 · Biological inputs
Target epitope / antigen structure
2 · Input representation
3D target coordinatesEpitope geometry
3 · Internal representation
Backbone geometrySequence-design state
4 · Architecture
RFdiffusion-derived generative pipeline
5 · Learning objective
Epitope-conditioned generation
6 · Output representation
Antibody sequence3D coordinates

Biological scale

proteincomplex

Modalities & tasks

AntibodyProteinGenerationOptimization

Registry, claims and frontier intelligence

Versioned registry

RFantibody

1 version record · latest curated year 2025. Model-family identity remains separate from capability and access changes.

Explore version lineage →

Inputs and outputs

Inputs

Target epitope / antigen structure

Outputs

Antibody candidatesPredicted complexes

Scientific and technical profile

Scientific principles

De novo antibody designEpitope conditioning

Technology

RFdiffusion lineageStructure-conditioned generation
Ideas before algorithms

Scientific lineage

Explore all foundations

These are transparent concept matches—not claims that one scientist alone caused this model. Each connection is based on the model’s recorded domain, scientific principles, technical terms or an explicit lineage link.

Biologics & genome engineering

Hybridoma production of monoclonal antibodies

Georges J. F. Köhler & César Milstein

Therapeutic antibodies, diagnostic antibodies and antibody discovery platforms became scalable and reproducible.

Matched concepts: antibody, antigen
Biologics & genome engineering

Somatic gene rearrangement generates antibody diversity

Susumu Tonegawa

Antibody language models and repertoire design operate on the sequence space created by V(D)J recombination and somatic diversification.

Matched concepts: antibody, sequence
Computational intelligence

Denoising diffusion generative models

Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Jonathan Ho and collaborators

Modern protein-backbone, molecular-pose and biomolecular-complex generators use diffusion to sample valid three-dimensional structures and designs.

Matched concepts: diffusion, generative
Medicinal chemistry & pharmacology

Selective toxicity and the ‘magic bullet’

Paul Ehrlich

Target selectivity, therapeutic index and mechanism-based screening remain central goals of drug discovery.

Matched concepts: target

Evaluation evidence

Dataset or evaluationExperimental antibody design
Task or metricEpitope-specific de novo design
Evidence statusPeer-reviewed + experimental
Open source ↗

Task-specific evidence only; not comparable as a universal leaderboard score.

Antibody sequence modelling

Experimental antibody design

RFantibody · Split details not yet normalized
experimental

A structured benchmark claim is recorded; consult the linked source for numeric values and protocol details.

Claim caveats
  • Protocol, split and implementation details must match before comparing this claim with another result.

Known limitations

  • Performance depends on the evaluation dataset and operating conditions.
  • Task-specific benchmark results should not be compared across unlike domains.
  • Outputs require task-specific scientific and experimental validation.

Milestones

2025

Experimentally evaluated de novo antibody designs have been reported.